login   |    register
Italeri [ MORE REVIEWS ] [ WEBSITE ] [ NEW STORIES ]

In-Box Review
135
Leopard 2A5
Leopard 2A5 German Main Battle Tank, Italeri no. 365
  • move

by: Tom Cromwell [ BARKINGDIGGER ]


Originally published on:
Armorama

Introduction

Development of the Leopard 2 tank began after the West Germans withdrew from the MBT 70 joint US-FRG project over spiraling costs in 1969. The new tank that emerged was lower and more angular than its Leopard 1 predecessor, capturing the now-familiar “turret on a raft” look of most late-20th century MBT’s like the Abrams or the Challenger 2. The hull had vertical sides on the much lower sponsons, and the turret was a big flat vertical-sided affair sporting a 120mm smooth-bore L44 Rheinmetall gun and a huge integral bustle that housed an ammo magazine designed with a blow-off roof panel to protect the crew from accidental blasts.

It was issued to troops in 1979, and soon there were (mostly internal) upgrades that took it from the 2A1 to 2A4 models. In 1998 the 2A5 model was issued, incorporating new spaced add-on armour panels to the turret front that radically altered its boxy appearance to something far more angular and aggressive. This new version eliminated the wedge-shaped aperture in the turret front plate for the gunner’s sight in favour of a periscope device, removing a weak point in the turret armour. It also included new side skirts that incorporated extra armour for the front portion of the hull. In 2007 the Leopard was up-gunned by installing the longer L55 120mm gun and the new combination became the 2A6.

Both Tamiya and Italeri have offered kits of the 2A5. The Italeri kit, number 365, has been around a number of years now. Connoisseurs will no doubt buy the Tamiya model, but I found the subject of this review going for a song in a second-hand stall at a model show so I thought it was worth a shot.

review

On opening the box, I found 4 sprues holding 268 parts moulded in a hard dark green plastic, along with 4 lengths of vinyl track, a decal sheet, a square of mesh, and the usual instructions. Quality of the mouldings is surprisingly good, with only a few ejector pin marks to contend with, and sink holes on only a few parts. Unfortunately this includes all of the separate suspension arms, so these will need to be filled & sanded.

Of rather more concern is the choice of moulding a number of details onto the kit rather than provide separate parts. In particular, the driver’s hatch and periscopes are part of the hull, as are the various vent covers and such on the engine deck. The two large fans on the rear deck are moulded on, but in fairness to Italeri they have done a great job capturing the 3-D effect of the fans below screen covers, so a little TLC with paint, washes and dry-brushing should bring these up a treat.

The lower hull consists of a massive tub with the dampers and suspension-arm mountings slide-moulded on, so there is a faint seam to remove where the sides meet the floor. Separate snubbers are provided for the arms, as well as separate mountings for the return rollers. The arms themselves are keyed to get positive alignment of the suspension on level ground, but a bit of simple surgery would allow them to be rotated for a more dynamic pose on a diorama. All the wheels and sprockets mount with plastic caps that must be glued in place, so once mounted they cannot be removed.

The tracks themselves are made up of two lengths of vinyl per side, with pins heat-welded together in the old-fashioned way. Each link has a shallow ejector mark on one of the inner-face pads that shouldn’t be too noticeable once mounted as long as care is taken not to highlight them too much with weathering. (Bronco and AFV Club both make aftermarket individual-link “workable” replacement track sets for the Leopard 2.) If using the Italeri tracks I’d recommend “training” them into curves for the sprockets and idler by folding them into loops at the appropriate places and wrapping a rubber band around to hold the fold for a week or two to set in the curve before building. (This helps reduce stress on the idler and sprocket axles.)

The upper hull is an equally massive slab that includes the sponson sides and the track guards at the front. Detail is fairly crisp and the anti-slip coatings are very subtle, but the effect is let down by the incorporation of too many moulded-on details where separate parts could have allowed for undercuts and pose-able display options. Chief among these is the driver’s sliding hatch, which is moulded closed. The sides suffer from another oddity first seen in Italeri’s earlier kit of the first Leopard 2 (kit 243) – the side skirts include panels of details that make up part of the hull sides. This means the upper hull has holes in its sides, and the whole thing cannot be finished ready for painting until the skirts are attached. That means the track and wheels must be in place too, so there will be some careful assembly and masking required, when if the skirts could be left off until last the track could be left off too. (I intend to cut these panels off and install them in the hull so the skirts can be added later…) On the rear the whole plate is a single piece, so details like the tail lights and convoy plate do not have the necessary undercuts. Fortunately this will not be visible except from directly underneath the tank.

The turret is impressive both for the sheer size and the amount of details that are added to it. On the real thing the boxy turret from earlier versions is simply encased in new add-on armour at the front, but Italeri chose to make the turret top with the spaced armour moulded on. This is adequate, but means the panels don’t quite “float” off of the main structure as they should, and of course cannot be removed. (The real things are, I believe, hinged for maintenance.) The second issue is that the gun mantlet is fixed in place and cannot elevate, so the gun is forever at horizontal. On the plus side the two-piece L44 barrel is quite reasonable including the semi-octagonal shape of the muzzle. And better still, the kit also includes the longer L55 barrel needed to upgrade the tank to 2A6 standards. The moulded-in “stowage” in the rear turret bin is best covered over with closed hatches.

At this point I should say that the kit includes optional parts and decals for the Netherlands version of the 2A5. On the turret this includes a different smoke launcher array and a new FN MAG machine-gun to replace the MG3 on the loader’s hatch. However, the Dutch tanks use slightly different side skirts, which are not provided. The two turret hatches can be posed open or closed, but of course there is no interior detail to see, and no crew to block the view. There is however an optional deep-wading “conning tower” to fit the commander’s hatch. There are two external stowage bins on the rear turret sides made up of a plastic “pipe” frame covered in mesh. Previous experience with this mesh leaves me worried about this assembly, and I may look for aftermarket etch to replace it.

Instructions:
These take Italeri’s usual form of a long thin booklet folded from a single piece of paper. A potted history in several languages is followed by useful drawings of the parts sprues, and then the isometric assembly drawings. Parts for the Dutch alternative are called out, and the painting instructions likewise show the two different markings, but suspiciously the base drawing of the camouflage is exactly the same!

Decals:
The sheet covers two vehicles with rather Spartan markings – one from the Bundeswehr and one from the Dutch forces.

Conclusion

While this kit is a little dated and has been overshadowed by the more detailed Tamiya version, it still has potential to build up into a very nice model of either the 2A5 or 2A6 version. Better still, it can be found at roughly half the price of its rival. The only issues I have are the non-elevating gun and the tracks, but both can be sorted with a little effort. For the dedicated Bundeswehr modeller on a budget this is a good way to add the latest generation of Leopard to the collection without breaking the bank.
SUMMARY
Highs: Nice mouldings, definitely 'looks the part'.
Lows: Some details moulded in place, gun cannot elevate.
Verdict: A worthwhile addition to the Bundeswehr collection at the price.
Percentage Rating
75%
  Scale: 1:35
  Mfg. ID: 365
  Suggested Retail: 15 GBP
  Related Link: 
  PUBLISHED: Jun 29, 2010
  NATIONALITY: Germany
NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE RATINGS
  THIS REVIEWER: 83.86%
  MAKER/PUBLISHER: 79.70%

About Tom Cromwell (barkingdigger)
FROM: ENGLAND - EAST ANGLIA, UNITED KINGDOM

A Yank living overseas on a long-term basis, I've been building tanks since the early '70s. I relish the challenges of older kits (remember when Tamiya was "new"?...) because I love to scratch-build.

Copyright ©2019 text by Tom Cromwell [ BARKINGDIGGER ]. All rights reserved.



Comments

Darrren, I've also got their original Leo 2 kit in the stash, and it all started as a slippery slope from the Leo 1A4... (I've resisted further slippage into Chally 2s and M1 Abrams so far, but this modern stuff isn't as bad as I used to think!) Tom
JUN 29, 2010 - 12:37 AM
Italeri should be commended, for providing decals for two countries. I've always believed that if more than one country used the plane or tank, it should come with decals for more than one country. But what's with the trend, among some manufacturers, of supplying the tracks in four lengths instead of just two? This is a practice that needs to go the way of the dinosaurs. It makes the tracks a lot harder to work with.
JUN 29, 2010 - 07:04 AM
I first saw these two-part tracks with Italeri, but Tasca do it too. So far I've replaced most Italeri ones with AM, but the Tasca ones look like they might be ok... I suppose at least the 2-pt tracks fit in the box without getting curled up at the ends! Tom
JUN 29, 2010 - 07:22 AM
The four-part tracks are indeed a pain, but with care the joints can all be hidden fairly well. The real problem is that they're nearly as stiff as the polystyrene parts. I couldn't see a way of persuading them to join together and stay on the running gear without forming a great big loop, so I went straight for the AFV Club replacements. If you can find a way of getting Tamiya or Hobby Boss tracks on their own, they're much more flexible and come in one piece, so they'll do nicely. Even Esci's old link-and-length jobs are better. The Matchbox boxing of the Revell version of the Italeri Leopard 2 is even worse. The tracks look as though they've been melted - almost no detail at all. So that was two AFV Club sets ...
JUN 29, 2010 - 09:31 PM
Yeah, I've got the new Bronco indy links lined up for this one! (Found them cheap at a show...) The stiff Italeri ones can be made to work if you "train" them into tight curves at the ends where the sprocket and idler will go. I bend them over a bit of dowling, add a rubber band to hold the loop, and leave it in the car on the dashboard for a week - the sun heating the car each day softens the vinyl and it takes a set in a curve. The result is a "flattened loop" of track that will sit properly around the wheels, but remember you can't then roll it along... (I've heard folk suggest bending the track to shape and dipping it in hot water for a moment, but I've had bad experiences trying it...) Tom
JUN 30, 2010 - 12:34 AM
Nice review and a good help deciding what LeoII to buy (It won't be this one). The cammo plan for german and dutch vehicles might well be the same, at least in Wiki sideshots look very close Oh and the review finally explains why MBT-70 failed withdrew from the MBT 70 joint US-DDR project over spiraling costs in 1969 Explains why East Germany (DDR) had a development boom back then too.
JUN 30, 2010 - 12:58 AM
Oh, b****r! Those gremlins got into my typing fingers again! Glad you pointed that one out - I'll put in an edit request PDQ. Of course, now it's all one country... Tom
JUN 30, 2010 - 01:44 AM
Too late, now the truth about MBT70 is out. MI5 will no longer be abel to keep a lid on it. OBTW: What is that Lynx MK7 doing over my yard? And why are they throwing down ropes?
JUN 30, 2010 - 02:11 AM
...of course as "alternative history" I can just picture the result of a US-East German tank project - an Abrams turret on a T-62... Tom
JUN 30, 2010 - 02:35 AM
   

What's Your Opinion?


Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move