That is truly a thing of beauty
Well done
You are viewing the archived version of the site.
Go to forums.kitmaker.net for info on latest news and other content.
Go to forums.kitmaker.net for info on latest news and other content.
Early Aviation
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
WnW Albatros D.V Manfred von Richtofen

joepanzer
North Carolina, United States
Member Since: January 21, 2004
entire network: 803 Posts
KitMaker Network: 19 Posts
Member Since: January 21, 2004
entire network: 803 Posts
KitMaker Network: 19 Posts

Posted: Monday, March 09, 2020 - 12:51 PM UTC

modelcellar

Posted: Thursday, March 12, 2020 - 01:21 PM UTC
Very NICE ! I really like the wood effect on the fuselage.
Paul
Paul

cloggerdemps
Posted: Friday, March 13, 2020 - 09:21 AM UTC
Very very impressive!

ColinEdm

Alberta, Canada
Member Since: October 15, 2013
entire network: 1,355 Posts
KitMaker Network: 19 Posts
Member Since: October 15, 2013
entire network: 1,355 Posts
KitMaker Network: 19 Posts

Posted: Friday, March 13, 2020 - 01:56 PM UTC
Thank uou all for the compliments!

phantom_phanatic309

Posted: Sunday, April 19, 2020 - 07:33 AM UTC
Beautiful work Colin.
I wondered how this particular scheme would turn out when I got the kit. Have to admit I wasn't sure how the red and bright green would look together.
But, that has changed. It looks great!
I wondered how this particular scheme would turn out when I got the kit. Have to admit I wasn't sure how the red and bright green would look together.
But, that has changed. It looks great!

Merlin

United Kingdom
Member Since: June 11, 2003
entire network: 17,582 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,250 Posts
Member Since: June 11, 2003
entire network: 17,582 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,250 Posts

Posted: Sunday, April 19, 2020 - 08:00 AM UTC
Hi Colin
That's absolutely fantastic!
But, Please can't we get the topic title corrected? Otherwise, we're going to live with this obvious mistake forever more - and it would have been sorted out within a day "back in the day". I can't understand how it's been allowed to carry on this long.
I'll do it straightaway if you give me the OK.
All the best
Rowan
That's absolutely fantastic!


But, Please can't we get the topic title corrected? Otherwise, we're going to live with this obvious mistake forever more - and it would have been sorted out within a day "back in the day". I can't understand how it's been allowed to carry on this long.
I'll do it straightaway if you give me the OK.
All the best
Rowan

![]() |